What reason could Bill have in bringing up the subject of vaccination in tandem with CO2 levels? He does want to drive home climate change as a reality here. He also has an insiders perspective on big pharma’s activities and it’s probable intentions for you and me, Joe Soap.
So, brain-box Bill, speaking to many like-minded people, felt comfortable going ‘stream of consciousness’ . And what came out?! His inner thoughts!
Being caught up in the moment, he drew the two concepts together following a path of least mental resistance. To him that is!… Revealing what he already knows to be an agenda for our future. Bill’s not mincing his words here. It’s up to us as individuals…
Obviously THIS is the context in which Bill thinks of vaccination, and the CO2 agenda, usually to himself. Depopulation, and Societal Control through this Co2 /industrial regulatory agenda.
He doesn’t even notice he has said something wrong here! Not a flinch out of him.
Why? This is the way he views us and these subjects off stage and more than likely, with his more influential chums. What a Freudian slip-up.
Thanks to Jack Blood for his take.
You can listen to him @
http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/programs.html
and
http://deadlinelive.info/category/shows/
Also, “Climategate 30 year timeline chart” View / Download pdf @…
http://joannenova.com.au/global-warming/climategate-30-year-timeline/
Christopher Monckton’s Climate Science site SPPI (Science & Public Policy Institute) …
http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/monckton/goreerrors.html
A Finnish member of the World Health Organization board, an advisor on vaccines, has received 6 million Euros for his research center from the vaccine manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline.
There are three basic facts you should remember when you are exercising your right to make an informed, voluntary vaccination choice for yourself or your child in America:
I never could have done what I have done without the habits of punctuality, order, and diligence, without the determination to concentrate myself on one subject at a time…
Twenty-plus years of research on antidepressants, from the old tricyclics to the newer selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) show that their benefit is hardly more than what patients get when they take a placebo.
